Transcend Launches Transcend Digital
New Solution Helps Financial Institutions Manage Collateral Across Traditional and Digital Assets
New offering extends Transcend’s platform to support tokenization initiatives and unify collateral workflows across TradFi and DeFi
NEW YORK AND LONDON — June 23, 2026 — Transcend Street Solutions today announced Transcend Digital, an extension of its collateral and liquidity optimization platform designed to help financial institutions manage collateral across traditional and digital market infrastructure through a single operating model.
As tokenized assets, digital settlement rails, and DLT-enabled collateral workflows move closer to production, firms need a practical way to participate in digital markets without adding operational fragmentation. Transcend Digital extends Transcend’s core platform into digital environments, giving clients unified workflows across traditional and DLT-based infrastructure.
Importantly, this provides clients with an operating layer to control, reconcile, optimize, and integrate tokenized assets into existing repo, margin, treasury, and collateral workflows.
With Transcend Digital, firms can support tokenized and non-tokenized collateral across eligibility, inventory, optimization, and booking workflows. Through smart contracts, two-way APIs, and integration with DLT ledgers and traditional infrastructure, firms can incorporate digital collateral into existing processes without major re-engineering.
The offering builds on Transcend’s established collateral ecosystem, which connects clients to more than 45 CCPs, 20+ custodians, five major triparty agents, nostro providers, and 10+ industry vendors, while extending connectivity to leading DLT networks and initiatives including Canton, HQLAx, and Ownera. Transcend is working with clients to support major tokenization initiatives scheduled to go live in 2026. The platform will provide connectivity to the Canton Network, optional wallet and key management integration, and workflows for assets tokenized through major CSDs and the Canton Network.
“Digital collateral cannot run on a separate operating model from traditional collateral,” said Bimal Kadikar, Chief Executive Officer of Transcend Street Solutions. “Firms need one platform to see it, optimize it, and move it across both worlds. That is what Transcend Digital delivers.”
Transcend Digital supports emerging use cases tied to real-time collateral mobility, digital asset integration, and cross-network interoperability as traditional and digital infrastructure converge. The launch reflects Transcend’s view that firms will need a single orchestration layer spanning both environments.
About Transcend
Transcend delivers technology solutions that help market participants optimize collateral, improve liquidity management, and streamline post-trade operations. Serving clients across the buy side and sell side, Transcend provides a unified platform for data, analytics, and workflow automation across increasingly complex market infrastructure.
Media Contact
Christopher Gohlke
Chief Marketing Officer
Transcend Street Solutions
christopher.gohlke@transcendstreet.com
Bridging TradFi and DeFi: A Practical Path to Tokenised Collateral
This article features Transcend CEO Bimal Kadikar discussing tokenized collateral, collateral mobility, and the evolution of hybrid TradFi and DeFi market structures.
Tokenisation has been discussed for years. Why does this moment in time feel different?
For a long time, tokenisation felt like a solution looking for a problem. What feels different now is that the market is starting to converge around clearer use cases and more practical objectives. In particular, collateral mobility has emerged as one of the leading areas where firms can see tangible value, especially when they think about intraday liquidity and the ability to move assets more efficiently across the market.
Another reason this moment feels different is that there is now more visible institutional momentum behind it. This has been triggered by recent regulatory changes, including the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) no-action letter, as well as the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation’s (DTCC’s) initiative in this space, which was a key catalyst. The Markets in Crypto Assets Regulation (MiCA), the GENIUS Act, and the Clarity Act have offered further clarity and helped progress tokenisation initiatives.
As a result, large infrastructures and market participants are no longer talking about tokenisation only as an innovation topic. They are now putting timelines, working groups, and real business activity behind it. That changes the nature of the conversation. It becomes less about theory and more about readiness, operating models, and how firms will connect these capabilities into existing businesses.
From our perspective, that is the real shift. The conversation is moving away from “Is tokenisation interesting?” and toward “How do firms actually use it in collateralised markets?”. Once the market starts asking that second question, the discussion becomes much more practical. It becomes about inventory, eligibility, movement, optimisation, and how firms manage both traditional and digital forms of collateral in a joined-up way.
So the short answer is that this feels different because the use cases are sharper, the industry momentum is stronger, and the conversation is now centred on implementation rather than just concept.
Where does Transcend fit into the tokenisation ecosystem, and what problem are you solving for clients?
Transcend fits into this ecosystem in a very natural way. We already work with clients to help them look across their inventory, understand eligibility for collateral, connect to different collateral ecosystems, optimise decision-making, and automate the straight-through movement of collateral. In other words, our TradFi track record is the foundation of our DeFi extension. The same core platform used for collateral optimisation by major institutions is being extended natively to digital rails rather than delivered as a separate digital asset tool. As tokenised assets become part of the picture, we see that as an extension of an ecosystem rather than an entirely separate market.
The way we think about it is simple: clients are not going to want one way of managing traditional collateral and another way of managing digital collateral. They need to see both together. They will need to make decisions across both together. They will need to act on those decisions in a way that feels coherent from an operating model standpoint. Our goal is to help make that possible.
That means creating a framework that insulates as much of the complexity as possible from the client. Whether collateral is held in traditional form or on digital rails, clients still need to answer the same basic questions. What is the best collateral to use? Where should it move? What is eligible? What is the most efficient path to delivery? Those are the questions Transcend is built to help answer, and we believe they remain the core questions in a more digital market structure as well.
So, we do not see our role as narrowly tied to tokenisation itself. We see our role as helping clients bridge traditional and digital environments, with the same emphasis on visibility, optimisation, and mobility that has always defined our platform.
Is this really a TradFi versus DeFi story, or are we moving toward a hybrid market structure where both will need to operate together?
We have a strong view that this is not a TradFi-versus-DeFi story. It is a hybrid market structure story. Financial institutions are not going to run traditional finance and digital finance on separate infrastructures over the long term, because the risks are common and the decisions need to be coordinated. If firms try to treat them as separate worlds, they will create more complexity rather than less.
This hybrid model of TradFi and DeFi provides the best of both worlds. Regulated institutions will continue to own the balance sheet, custody, and legal framework, while distributed ledger technology (DLT)/DeFi-inspired architectures provide programmability, interoperability, atomic settlement, collateral mobility, and 24/7 operational models.
The practical issue is that the same economic exposure may appear in different places and different forms. A firm may hold a security in one traditional venue today, but in the future that same security may also exist in digital form on one or more networks. Economically, it is still the same security, but operationally, the characteristics may be very different. That means firms will need to understand not only the asset itself, but also the venue, the rails, the settlement mechanics, and the implications for how that asset can be mobilised or optimised.
That is why the hybrid model matters. Firms will need a harmonised view. They will need to understand their inventory across both traditional and digital environments. They will need to know the sources and uses of collateral across both. They will need to apply eligibility logic and optimisation logic across both. And they will need to do all of that without fragmenting the operating model into separate tracks.
Our positioning is built around that view. We want to help clients achieve a holistic and harmonised view of collateral so that they can operate across both environments with consistency. In our view, the future is not about choosing one side or the other; it is about helping firms function well in a market where both exist together.
What initiatives are you working on in the DLT space?
This has been a very active area for Transcend over the last 12 months. We are involved in numerous global initiatives, with several now gaining meaningful momentum. One important milestone is that we are now part of the Canton network.
We are also actively working on the DTCC initiative, which is moving forward on an aggressive timeline, with the first milestone in July and the next in October. We are working with DTCC, as well as some of our clients, to support many use cases, including scenarios where collateral is tokenised through DTCC and then mobilised on the Canton network.
We are very proud to be part of those working groups, and we intend to support our clients with the capabilities needed both to receive and to post collateral to other parties. We see this as an important milestone for the industry as it points to real trades and real use cases, with multiple parties participating in a blockchain environment supported by Canton on one side and enabled by DTCC on the other.
In addition, we are involved in other working groups, such as Ownera. Ownera is focused on supporting tokenised money market funds and their mobility across a range of participants. We took part in an earlier simulation and expect to participate in the next round as well, where we can demonstrate how Transcend’s optimisation, decision-making, and collateral mobility framework support those use cases.
Similarly, we are working with HQLAX in its collateralisation efforts, along with a number of other active initiatives in the market. Our goal is not to pick winners. We intend to be wherever our clients need us to be, and we prioritise integration and connectivity based on client demand. In that sense, we see ourselves as a neutral enabler focused on helping clients operate effectively across a developing DLT ecosystem.
What are the biggest barriers to adoption today, and what needs to happen for tokenised collateral to scale?
The main barrier is not simply that the technology is new. The bigger challenge is integration. For large, regulated institutions, tokenised collateral cannot remain a stand-alone experiment. If it is going to scale, it has to connect into the collateral systems, financing systems, books and records, risk and operational processes that firms already rely on every day.
That is where the difficulty comes in. Once firms start working in digital environments, they are dealing with new constructs, new workflows, and technical concepts that are not native to the way these businesses have operated over time. But the business still needs to function as a unified operating model. Collateral still has to be seen, managed, moved, and optimised in the context of the full enterprise. If that integration is too difficult, too manual, or too bespoke, then adoption is likely to stay stuck in pilots and proofs of concept.
Scaling is actually straightforward in principle, even if it is hard in practice. Clients need to be able to bring digital collateral into their normal operating framework. They need to keep track of it alongside the rest of their inventory. They need to know how to compare it with other collateral activities. They need to know when to use it, how to move it, and how to integrate it into their broader optimisation and financing decisions. Once that becomes seamless enough, adoption can move beyond experimentation.
That is where we believe Transcend can play an important role. We are investing heavily in helping clients solve exactly that last-mile problem. If we can make it easier for firms to integrate digital collateral into their day-to-day collateral and financing ecosystem, then we help remove one of the biggest obstacles to scale.
What would you say to firms that are still skeptical about the future of tokenisation, or that have not yet become actively involved?
I would say that anyone in the collateralised markets or securities finance industry should be paying close attention to this space now. There is a lot of momentum, there is a lot of activity, and the market is moving beyond abstract discussion. You do not have to believe that everything will change overnight, but you do need to understand what is happening and where it may affect your business.
I would also say that firms do not need to start by worrying about every technical detail. A lot of conversations around tokenised collateral quickly go deep into blockchain mechanics, wallets, smart contracts, and the underlying architecture. Those things matter, but for many institutions the more immediate question is how these developments connect to their own business, their own infrastructure, and their own operating model. That is where the conversation should begin.
In other words, the right first step is not to chase technology for its own sake. It is to build understanding. Firms should look at what these developments mean from a platform angle, from a collateral angle, and from a business process angle. They should ask where the operational friction will be, where the opportunities are, and what they would need in place to participate effectively.
That is exactly where we think we can help. We can work with clients on execution, but also on education and practical understanding. The goal is to help make that transition easier and more manageable so that firms can participate in this evolution without having to rebuild everything from scratch. ■
Ready to Explore Tokenised Collateral?
See how Transcend helps firms connect traditional and digital collateral ecosystems through a unified operating model.
Cleared Derivative CCPs and the Future of Enterprise Collateral Optimization
Cleared Derivative CCPs and the Future of Enterprise Collateral Optimization
The last decade of cross-product collateral optimization has primarily focused on improving funding and balance sheets of OTC businesses, which was seen as the low hanging fruit. However, the benefits of applying technology to funding cleared derivative exposures at CCPs extend even further. Firms can ultimately reduce costs, implement stronger controls, and drive better collateral optimization.
Acting on Lessons Learned from Periods of Market Volatility
In any crisis, cleared derivatives are the go-to product for hedging and reacting quickly to uncertain market environments. Periods of turbulent market volatility emphasize two previously known but understated points:
- CCP funding is a manual process that requires investment. In periods of market stress, human effort can neither scale overnight nor easily provide crucial exposure or liquidity management information in real time. Manually initiating global payment and collateral movement instructions to meet multiple, often simultaneous, CCP calls is a daily scramble. Additionally, pledging collateral may involve using a different interface or user screen for each CCP. This creates an operational risk nightmare, since failing to meet margin calls at CCPs on time or erroneously moving assets between client-segregated pools and house accounts are regulatory breaches.
- Higher initial margins at CCPs are here to stay. Firms need smart tools to optimize how exposures are covered on a day-to-day basis, especially if interest rates are changing at the same time. For technical reasons and in line with their risk policies, CCPs may find themselves steadily increasing initial margin rates almost every day for the most volatile contracts. The Futures Industry Association estimated that the aggregate amount of initial margin at CCPs rose from $833.9 billion at the end of Q1 20201 to $1.09 trillion by Q4 2025, a 31% increase 2.
Without scalable processes and flexible tools, firms are constantly on the back foot trying to manually manage rising margin calls. Meanwhile, in turbulent markets, CCPs may issue repeated and competing unscheduled intra-day margin calls to secure changing real-time exposures of their clearing members.
Opening an Optimization Opportunity Window by Automating the Underlying CCP Margin Process
CCP margin management can be at the nexus of multiple groups and functions, from a dedicated Operations or funding desk in the Front Office or the Group Treasury team. Each group understands that at a basic level, their primary objective is completing all mandatory funding moves on time. Ideally, they would also like the ability to integrate corporate objectives on liquidity management or funding cost optimization to how daily calls are met.
Manual processes and spreadsheets already make it difficult to stay on top of mandatory margin calls; without scalable workflows, firms will be unable to action the increased movements required for optimization. Firms face an added opportunity cost if Operations teams do not have unfettered access to the best available collateral inventory to satisfy a call. Those that do may lack the operational awareness of each CCP eligibility criteria and operational lodging procedures.
While a firm-wide optimization system that internalizes the constraints created by each CCP can solve these challenges, connecting CCP requirements is no easy feat. Each CCP has unique eligibility rules and cut-offs for every asset, cash or securities, at every location where collateral is needed. Varying regional requirements pose further challenges: in the United States, the CME and ICE operate under different regulations than the OCC. Meanwhile, in Europe, up to sixteen CCPs could be issuing margin calls to a firm within a two-hour window in the morning and can potentially issue intra-day margin calls every hour into the evening. In Asia, and to an extent in post-Brexit Europe, the global clearing business is channeled through local affiliates and external brokers that act as the access point to local CCPs.
Firms need a platform that unifies this mosaic of processing rules and consolidates exposures and assets for each legal entity. Such a system could process configurable rules to satisfy the initial round of CCP margin calls and feed reliable data to a secondary, deeper, daily optimization run designed to improve overall collateral allocations across the enterprise.
Achieving Around-the-Clock Operational Compliance and Regulatory Transparency
Firms that consolidate CCP call data, eligibility criteria and inventory management rules in a single global platform also ensure consistent global processing standards. Firms with CCP funding teams in different regional hubs can make “pass the book” handovers between time zones far more efficient and less risky.
Having scalable and automated processes for CCP funding is also a matter of compliance. In Europe, the arrival of new segregation models that are margined with their own dedicated collateral pool but remain part of an overall net client-side settlement with CCPs to reduce payment costs creates reporting complexity. It is critical to effectively and accurately reverse-engineer CCP computations to journal each gross component into the correct ledger from a single net payment.
Equally, firms are challenged to comply with rules that prohibit automatically releasing excess collateral from individually segregated client accounts at CCPs. Firms must proactively initiate a recall if one client is covered overall but with an excess at one CCP and a deficit at a second CCP. Without proactive recalls, firms risk not being able to repay themselves in time to pay the deficit. This compliance complexity increases for firms with several customers across multiple CCPs.
There are many more regulatory stakeholders in need of reliable CCP exposure data beyond those who simply handle daily CCP collateralization. Some, like risk managers, require trusted time series data to assess average and peak margins at CCPs for periodic regulatory reporting on their exposure to Financial Market Utilities (FMUs). Others, like senior treasurers, only need it by exception, such as on days of heightened market volatility, to assess at that instant the liquidity drag from CCP funding. Regardless of use case, all such stakeholders can mutually benefit from accurate, real-time, consolidated, and accessible data.
Regulators, for their part, have increased their interest in the liquidity impact of clearing at CCPs and expect firms to handle liquidity management more effectively.
Bringing Cleared Derivatives into the Overall Collateral Focus
Cleared derivative CCPs represent a growing proportion of collateralized exposures for many firms; this cannot be ignored. There is also the growing proportion of business directing activity onto CCPs in other asset classes, such as FX and repo.
From our experience, firms that invest decisively in a smart CCP margin management platform that is integrated throughout the enterprise can expect to benefit on three levels:
- Cost Savings: A single portal that interfaces with CCPs globally and harmonizes their bespoke collateral eligibility, funding routines and collateral booking flows achieves cost savings through end-to-end automation of transactions. It provides required scalability in an otherwise highly manual and error-prone environment and removes the connectivity costs associated with constantly adapting to changing CCP interfaces and data formats.
- Improved Controls: Real-time visibility into global collateral and cash flows improves a firm’s control and risk management framework. Seamlessly sharing reliable data between Operations, Treasury and Trading teams delivers enterprise-wide harmonization and elevated strategic vision, such as the ability to detect large cash commitments in time to plan for the best way to meet these obligations. Deploying system-based rules to navigate the complexity of CCP collateral lodging rules improves accuracy, reduces unused excess and avoids time-consuming fails or missed cut-offs.
- Enhanced Returns: By optimizing funding across CCPs and further integrating with other firm-wide optimization strategies, a single platform can help firms better deploy scarce resources, ultimately lowering the cost of funding CCP exposures.
Some specific benefits include:
- Analyzing and optimizing firm-wide liquidity and exposure management.
- Identifying excess cash or collateral in real time with the confidence and controls to proactively reduce otherwise trapped liquidity.
- Integrating collateral allocations within a broader optimization strategy to scale collateral allocation by systematically selecting the best collateral to deliver based on comprehensive firm guidance, rather than historical availability.
With such a compelling case to improve controls and lower the cost of funding, now is the time to act on lessons learned from turbulent markets.
References
1“FIA issues white paper on the impact of pandemic volatility on CCP margin requirements,” FIA, October 29, 2020, available at https://www.fia.org/resources/fia-issues-white-paper-impact-pandemicvolatility-ccp-margin-requirements
2“Initial Margin – Combined,” FIA, available at https://www.fia.org/fia/initial-margin-combined
Finadium: Transcend, Canton, and the race to bridge TradFi and DeFi collateral
Finadium: Transcend, Canton, and the Race to Bridge TradFi and DeFi Collateral
This article originally appeared on Finadium.com.
In a further sign of the times for collateral management technology vendors, Transcend announced it’s connected to the Canton Network to support real-time mobility of tokenized assets. We examine emerging competitive dynamics as adoption of distributed ledger technology (DLT) networks grows and firms look to optimize across a hybrid world of on-chain and traditional rails.
The move expands Transcend’s strategy of supporting interoperability and collateral optimization across different venues. It positions it as a central orchestration layer for collateral and liquidity and follows initiatives by other collateral vendors such as Nasdaq to connect to the Canton Network. Transcend claims it is the only collateral platform that can connect its clients to an entire ecosystem of more than 45 central counterparties, five triparty agents and now DLT networks like Canton.
“We see a clear shift toward a hybrid financial system where traditional and decentralized models will coexist for a period of time. Transcend’s strategy is to act as the interoperability layer between these worlds, giving clients the ability to manage, optimize, and mobilize collateral seamlessly across both traditional infrastructure and emerging DLT networks.”
— Bimal Kadikar, CEO of Transcend
As more activity moves to DLT, firms will need to manage two different sets of technology, cost structures, and data formats. This includes two-way translation between systems based on real-time vs. batch settlement. And they will need to manage the fragmentation that arises as more networks emerge. In addition, they must deal with friction and latency when on and off-ramping from DLT to traditional rails. More native issuance and greater number of counterparts on chain will allow firms to deploy and stay on the DLT network rather than on- and off-ramping. But DLT infrastructure and traditional rails will need to coexist in parallel for some time. Transcend is looking to solve these issues with its connection to Canton, while also paving the way for collateral optimization across traditional and DLT rails.
A new dynamic in collateral optimization
Transcend’s move highlights a new trend in collateral technology: the ability to optimize allocation decisions across both tokenized and traditional pools. If a client holds tokenized US Treasuries on Canton alongside traditional holdings at a CSD, an optimization engine that can see and mobilize both pools will add more value. The vendor that can route a margin call to whichever pool settles fastest, cheapest, or with the least balance sheet impact will create real cost savings for users. As intraday liquidity management using DLT accelerates, collateral allocation will also become a real-time control problem rather than periodic optimization cycles, adding complexity.
Canton Network use for TradFi still in the early stages
Transcend’s announcement comes as more market participants and market infrastructures run pilots and onboard to the Canton Network. Despite this activity, we are not yet seeing much evidence beyond pilots that firms are using Canton to interoperate across different underlying DLT networks for real-world assets.
According to analytics firm rwa.xyz, all of the real-world asset volume on the Canton Network comes from Broadridge’s Distributed Ledger Repo platform. But these are “represented assets” rather than “distributed assets” on Canton, suggesting that Broadridge’s solution is using Canton as a record keeping layer rather than using the network as a distribution layer that allows on chain transfer. It therefore appears that market participants are not yet using Canton at scale to atomically settle the securities leg of a repo on one DLT network and settle the cash leg on another platform using digital cash such as JPM coin for example.
We expect this to change as more natively issued assets come on chain. DTCC has announced it will tokenize DTC-Custodied US Treasury Securities on Canton. Meanwhile, J.P. Morgan says it will natively issue its deposit token, JPM Coin, on the network. More technology vendors like Transcend connecting to Canton will also create a feedback loop where connectivity drives adoption, adoption drives liquidity, and liquidity drives further connectivity.
Transcend’s approach suggests a world where collateral is abstracted from its location and treated as a fungible resource across networks using digital twins to mobilize assets quickly and easily. In future, we may see Transcend extend this connectivity to Ethereum-based DLT networks, HQLAX R3-based infrastructure, or Fnality’s payment rail. As adoption grows, DLT connectivity and venue or settlement types of optimization might become a differentiator in a highly competitive collateral technology vendor space. Market participants should take this paradigm into account as they consider their collateral technology strategy going forward.
See how Transcend connects traditional and DLT networks to optimize collateral in real time.
What the SEC’s Latest 15c3-3 Guidance Means for Using Equities as Collateral in Securities Lending
Expanding Collateral Flexibility in Securities Lending
The SEC’s latest guidance on Rule 15c3-3 is a targeted change, but it addresses a meaningful constraint in securities lending.
The key update allows broker-dealers to pledge baskets of certain liquid U.S. equities (S&P 500 and Russell 1000 stocks) as collateral when borrowing securities from customers under fully-paid lending structures. In practice, this gives firms more flexibility in how they structure and fund these transactions.
Historically, firms often had to rely on HQLA Level 1 assets such as cash or government securities to meet regulatory requirements. While effective from a compliance standpoint, that approach tied up high-quality assets that could otherwise be deployed more productively across the balance sheet.
Firms now have more optionality to put their equities collateral to work. Instead of reserving HQLA to satisfy regulatory constraints, they can use a broader set of assets, improving both flexibility and efficiency. For global equities financing desks, this has a direct impact on inventory utilization, funding strategy, and overall returns.
At the same time, increased flexibility introduces a new layer of complexity. Firms need to manage a wider range of eligible collateral, apply rules consistently across counterparties, and make allocation decisions that balance regulatory requirements with commercial objectives. As collateral optionality increases, the challenge shifts from access to collateral to how effectively it is managed, requiring real-time visibility into inventory, eligibility, and usage across financing and margin obligations.
The introduction of customer equities (the SEC guidance excludes firm-owned equities) as a more usable form of collateral increases the number of potential allocation decisions. The same asset may be eligible for securities lending, margin requirements, or liquidity management, each with different economic and regulatory considerations. Without a coordinated view, firms risk suboptimal allocation, where high-value assets are underutilized or deployed inefficiently while other constraints remain unmet.
As stated by Finadium, “Managing this will require changes to systems: life cycle events; collateral eligibility and concentration; and index composition. Vendor or in-house technological solutions and workflow automation are needed to reduce the operational burden for some of these manual processes.”
ISLA Americas, in its white paper New Opportunities for Fully-Paid Borrow: Equity-for-Equity Securities Loans, doubled down on this statement: “Enhancing your platforms is likely required to participate. All participants should review, and as needed enhance, your systems to handle the specific lifecycle events of E4E, particularly the monitoring of collateral eligibility (e.g., tracking index membership) and managing the five-day grace period for ineligible securities.”
This is where the Transcend platform can serve as a critical aid from an operational standpoint. By aggregating inventory across custodians, CCPs, and bilateral counterparties into a single, real-time view, firms can assess availability and constraints holistically rather than in silos, evaluate eligibility across exposures, and apply optimization logic to determine how collateral should be deployed across competing uses.
In practice, this allows firms to move from a reactive model, where collateral is allocated based on immediate needs or manual processes, to a more proactive and systematic approach. The benefit is not only improved efficiency, but also greater control over balance sheet usage and funding outcomes. This ultimately shifts the conversation from compliance to the ability to manage economics, where firms that can integrate visibility, eligibility, and optimization into a single operating model are better positioned to make value-driven decisions.
How Transcend Supports This Shift
As collateral flexibility increases under Rule 15c3-3, the ability to manage inventory, eligibility, and allocation in a coordinated way becomes more important. Transcend provides the operational infrastructure to support this.
- Centralized inventory visibility: Transcend aggregates collateral positions across custodians, CCPs, triparty agents, and bilateral counterparties into a single, real-time view. This allows firms to understand what assets are available and where they can be deployed.
- Eligibility and constraint management: Regulatory, counterparty, and internal eligibility rules are applied consistently across all positions. This ensures collateral decisions remain aligned with economic objectives and binding constraints, such as 15c3-3.
- Optimization across competing uses: Transcend enables firms to evaluate how collateral should be allocated across securities lending, margin, and liquidity needs. This supports more efficient use of both customer equities and HQLA assets.
- Intraday decision-making and automation: By automating allocation and movement workflows, firms can respond more quickly to changing conditions and reduce reliance on manual processes.
- Connectivity across the ecosystem: Integration with custodians, CCPs, and counterparties allows firms to act on decisions, not just analyze them, improving execution and operational efficiency.
In combination, these capabilities allow firms to translate increased collateral optionality into measurable balance sheet and funding benefits.
See how Transcend helps firms optimize collateral allocation under evolving 15c3-3 requirements.
Transcend Connects to Canton Network to Enable Real-Time Optimization of Tokenized Assets
Transcend Connects to Canton Network to Enable Real-Time Optimization and Mobility of Tokenized Assets
NEW YORK AND LONDON — Transcend, a leader in collateral and liquidity optimization technology, announced it has connected to the Canton Network to enable real-time mobility of tokenized assets. Transcend is the only collateral platform that can connect its clients to an entire ecosystem of more than 45 CCPs, five triparty agents and now leading DLT networks like Canton.
The service supports clients’ ability to move collateral and cash instantly and optimally across counterparties and markets, using a combination of traditional and tokenized assets.
Transcend is also building connectors from Canton nodes to clients’ existing internal systems, with two-way APIs to translate DeFi to and from TradFi. In addition, Transcend is building a node-as-a-service on Canton and the translation software for clients’ internal systems to communicate with DeFi nodes—starting with Canton and extending to other DLT platforms.
This development extends Transcend’s role as a central orchestration layer for collateral and liquidity, enabling clients to incorporate tokenized assets into existing workflows without disrupting current operating models.
“We are thrilled to join the Canton Network—a defining moment for Transcend and the clients we serve. The future of collateral is TradFi and DeFi, operating in concert for the foreseeable future, and Transcend is at the heart of making that real. By connecting networks like Canton with traditional financial infrastructure, we give institutions the power to analyze, optimize and mobilize collateral seamlessly across both worlds. We couldn’t be more excited to be leading that transition.”
— Bimal Kadikar, CEO of Transcend Street Solutions
“We’re pleased to see Transcend extend its collateral optimization platform to Canton. The ability to integrate tokenized assets into existing collateral workflows is a critical step toward enabling real-time, cross-market collateral mobility. Transcend’s approach will help strengthen the range of interoperable applications on Canton and support broader institutional adoption.”
— Kelly Mathieson, Chief Business Development Officer at Digital Asset, a co-creator of Canton
About Transcend
Transcend delivers innovative technology solutions that help market participants optimize collateral, improve liquidity management, and streamline post-trade operations. With clients across the buy side and sell side, Transcend provides a unified platform for data, analytics, and workflow automation.
For more information, please contact: christopher.gohlke@transcendstreet.com
See how Transcend helps securities finance desks optimize collateral in real time.
Unlocking Liquidity in Securities Finance Through Collateral Optimization
Why Liquidity Efficiency Matters in Securities Finance
Liquidity has become a defining constraint in securities finance markets. Balance sheet capacity is expensive, regulatory requirements have tightened funding conditions, and volatility can trigger sudden increases in margin demand. For securities lending and repo desks, the challenge is no longer simply sourcing assets or locating borrows, it is using available collateral as efficiently as possible.
Funding desks operate across a complex ecosystem of clearinghouses, custodians, counterparties, and internal business units. Each maintains its own eligibility schedules, haircut requirements, and settlement processes. As a result, liquidity is often fragmented across the enterprise.
At the same time, the volume and frequency of margin calls has increased. Intraday price movements, tighter risk management standards, and market volatility mean firms must mobilize collateral quickly and accurately. When collateral cannot move efficiently, liquidity becomes constrained even when sufficient assets technically exist within the firm.
Many securities finance desks are therefore rethinking how they approach collateral management. Rather than treating collateral as a static pool of assets, leading firms increasingly view it as a strategic resource that requires strategic-level technology.
The Problem of Trapped Collateral
One of the most common inefficiencies in securities finance is trapped collateral. Assets may exist within the organization but are not positioned where they are needed when funding or margin obligations arise.
Collateral inventories are frequently fragmented across legal entities, custodians, and clearing systems. A firm may hold ample government bonds or equities, yet those assets may sit within accounts that cannot easily be mobilized to meet obligations elsewhere in the organization.
Eligibility constraints add another layer of complexity. Assets that qualify as collateral in one repo or securities lending transaction may not qualify in another. Without clear visibility into these requirements, firms often default to posting their highest-quality liquid assets even when more efficient alternatives exist.
Operational complexity further compounds the problem. Many institutions still rely on manual workflows or fragmented systems to determine which assets should be delivered to meet margin calls or financing needs. This reactive approach often leads to suboptimal collateral allocation and higher funding costs.
The result is that large portions of a firm’s balance sheet remain underutilized. Liquidity appears constrained even though suitable assets may exist somewhere within the enterprise.
The Role of Optimization in Unlocking Value
Collateral optimization helps firms allocate assets more intelligently across margin and funding obligations.
Optimization platforms analyze available inventories, eligibility schedules, and funding requirements in real time. Rather than selecting collateral manually for each transaction, optimization engines evaluate multiple variables simultaneously, including haircuts, funding costs, liquidity value, and counterparty rules.
The objective is simply to allocate the right asset to the right obligation at the lowest possible target state cost.
Modern technology such as Transcend’s collateral optimization platform delivers these capabilities across the enterprise, allowing firms to automatically determine the most efficient collateral to deliver across financing and margin obligations. By connecting inventory data, collateral schedules, and funding requirements, the platform enables firms to identify opportunities that would otherwise remain hidden within fragmented systems.
For securities finance desks, this approach improves funding efficiency by ensuring scarce assets are preserved for situations where they are truly required. It also strengthens liquidity management during periods of market stress, when firms must respond quickly to rising margin calls or shifting funding conditions.
In clearing environments, automation becomes even more critical. Solutions such as Transcend’s CCP Central help firms select and pledge the most efficient collateral to meet margin requirements while automating the movement of assets across accounts, reducing the need for buffers and retaining the highest-quality collateral for the organization.
Building Liquidity-Resilient Operations
In today’s securities finance market, liquidity resilience is becoming a strategic priority. Firms must be able to respond quickly to changing market conditions, regulatory developments, and shifting funding requirements.
Achieving this requires better visibility across collateral inventories, greater automation in collateral allocation, and stronger alignment between securities finance desks and treasury funding strategies.
Technology platforms that combine inventory intelligence, analytics, and optimization allow firms to operationalize this approach. By aggregating collateral data across systems and automating allocation decisions, firms gain the ability to manage liquidity and funding more proactively rather than reacting to margin pressure after it occurs.
For securities finance participants, liquidity is not just about how much collateral a firm holds but how effectively that collateral is deployed. Firms that invest in smarter collateral optimization frameworks are better positioned to unlock trapped liquidity, improve funding efficiency, and navigate complex market conditions.
To learn how Transcend helps unlock trapped liquidity and optimize collateral allocation across margin and funding obligations, request a demo of our collateral optimization solutions.
See how Transcend helps securities finance desks optimize collateral in real time.
Collateral Management Is Becoming a Core Capability for Insurers
Collateral Management Is Becoming a Core Capability for Insurers
Collateral management as a back-office or out-sourced process focused on periodic reconciliation is no longer a tenable strategy for most insurers. Margin volatility, tighter funding conditions and increased regulatory scrutiny have elevated collateral management into a core operational capability. Insurers are now expected to understand where collateral sits, how it moves and how risk requirements evolve in a timely manner as market conditions change.
Recent regulatory developments have reinforced this shift. One clear example is the collateral stress testing requirement introduced by the UK’s Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA). While the PRA framework applies directly to UK-regulated insurers, it reflects a broader regulatory expectation. Supervisors are increasingly focused on whether firms can manage collateral risks in practice, not just analyze them in isolation. Strong day-to-day collateral management is now the foundation for meeting both operational and regulatory expectations.
What Good Collateral Management Looks Like Today
Effective collateral management starts with visibility. Insurers benefit from a consolidated view of exposures, margin requirements, collateral positions and available liquidity across counterparties and portfolios. This foundation supports more informed analysis and decision-making.
Best practices also emphasize consistency. Margin methodologies, eligibility rules and settlement processes that reflect how collateral behaves under normal market conditions help reduce complexity and improve confidence in outcomes. As markets evolve, aligning processes more closely with operational reality becomes increasingly valuable.
Most importantly, collateral management should support timely decision-making. The ability to anticipate funding needs, manage collateral usage efficiently and adjust positions proactively allows teams to operate with greater flexibility as conditions change.
Why Timely Collateral Management Matters
As margin calls become more frequent and funding conditions tighten, having timely visibility and decision-making capability creates clear advantages. Insurers that streamline collateral workflows can respond more efficiently, optimize collateral usage and manage liquidity with greater precision.
These improvements help control funding costs, enhance margin flexibility, and strengthen counterparty relationships. Over time, they also support more constructive engagement with regulators.
This is where regulatory exercises such as stress testing add value. Stress scenarios help highlight how everyday collateral management processes perform under pressure and where additional refinement can deliver benefits.
The PRA requirement is best viewed as a signal rather than an end goal. It underscores the importance of robust, repeatable collateral management practices that extend beyond periodic reporting.
Insurers with well-aligned collateral frameworks often find regulatory stress testing easier to produce, explain, and maintain. For others, regulatory requirements can serve as a useful catalyst to enhance existing processes and strengthen governance over time.
How Transcend Supports Collateral Management Best Practices
Transcend helps insurers enhance collateral management by integrating analytics, stress testing and operational workflows into a single framework. Rather than treating regulatory exercises as standalone tasks, insurers can align them with how collateral and liquidity are managed day to day.
This approach supports clearer insight into margin behavior, more efficient collateral usage and better-informed funding decisions. Stress testing becomes a supporting capability that reinforces the strength of existing processes rather than an additional reporting burden.
For UK insurers, this supports PRA expectations. For insurers globally, it provides a scalable approach aligned with modern collateral management best practices.
Turning a Regulatory Trigger Into a Strategic Advantage
The PRA requirement may be the immediate catalyst, but the opportunity is broader. Strong collateral management supports better liquidity planning, reduces operational complexity and enables more confident capital decisions across market cycles.
Insurers that use this moment to refine and strengthen collateral management practices will be well positioned to respond to market change, engage constructively with regulators and manage funding pressures as conditions evolve.
If you want to understand how Transcend supports collateral management best practices and embeds regulatory requirements into everyday operations, talk to us about building a practical, repeatable approach to managing collateral and liquidity risk.
See how insurers put modern collateral management into practice.
Transcend Launches Dedicated Service To Help UK Insurers Meet New PRA Collateral Stress Testing Requirements
Transcend Launches PRA Collateral Stress Testing Service for UK Insurers
NEW YORK AND LONDON — Transcend, a leader in collateral and liquidity optimization technology, today announced the launch of a specialized service designed to help UK insurance firms meet the Prudential Regulation Authority’s (PRA) new collateral stress testing requirements outlined in CP19/24.
The PRA’s proposed rules introduce stricter requirements for understanding, monitoring, and projecting collateral needs under stressed market conditions. With compliance required by September 30, 2026, insurers are facing significant data, modeling, and operational challenges that most existing systems are not built to handle.
Transcend’s new service gives insurers a complete, purpose-built framework to satisfy these requirements without adding strain to internal systems or teams. The service combines Transcend’s data integration and optimization engine with targeted workflows supporting the PRA’s expectations on scenario design, collateral projection, and liquidity impacts.
“Insurance firms are under pressure to comply with evolving regulatory standards while maintaining increasingly complex market-driven collateral demands,” said Bimal Kadikar, CEO of Transcend. “Our goal is to give insurers a fast, reliable way to meet the PRA’s expectations while improving their visibility and control over collateral under stress.”
Key Capabilities
- Automated collection, validation, and enrichment of collateral and exposure data across booking systems, custodians, and investment portfolios
- Scenario-based modeling aligned with the PRA’s expectations in CP19/24
- Forward-looking projections of collateral needs and liquidity impacts under stress
- Identification of shortfalls and optimization opportunities
- Role-based reporting for risk teams, senior management, and boards
- Optional integration with Transcend’s enterprise collateral optimization platform for firms seeking broader transformation
“Regulation is tightening, timelines are short, and insurers need a partner fluent in both the technical and operational realities of these complex new requirements,” said Todd Hodgin, CPO of Transcend. “This service gives firms an immediate path to compliance while laying the groundwork for broader, long-term efficiency gains.”
The solution is designed to meet UK PRA requirements while also supporting global insurers seeking clearer visibility into how collateral needs shift under market stress. This level of insight enables faster, better-informed decisions around liquidity, risk management, and operational readiness.
Readiness Checklist
Preparing for PRA collateral stress testing can be complex.
Click here to download our Readiness Checklist for PRA Collateral Stress Testing.
About Transcend
Transcend delivers innovative technology solutions that help market participants optimize collateral, improve liquidity management, and streamline post-trade operations. With clients across the buy side and sell side, Transcend provides a unified platform for data, analytics, and workflow automation.
For more information, please contact:
christopher.gohlke@transcendstreet.com
Industry Expert Jonathan Hodder Joins Transcend to Expand EMEA Business
New York, NY; June 22, 2022 – Transcend, a leading provider of liquidity, funding, and collateral optimisation solutions has appointed Jonathan Hodder as Director of EMEA Sales. In this role, Hodder will focus on growing Transcend’s global footprint, particularly expanding the Company’s physical presence in Europe and penetrating the Asian markets.
“Transcend has seen tremendous growth over the last few years, which can be largely attributed to the addition of high-quality industry professionals like Jonathan,” said BJ Marcoullier, Head of Sales & Business Development at Transcend. “As we look to scale this momentum, Jonathan will play an instrumental role in helping us address regional-specific challenges and continue to deliver a best-in-class solution suite and client experience.”
Hodder brings more than 20 years of securities finance expertise to Transcend. Most recently, he led European Sales for FIS, focusing on securities finance and collateral management. Prior to joining FIS, Hodder spent nearly a decade as Global Head of Sales and Marketing for EquiLend. Earlier in his career, Hodder worked with the publishing team at Euromoney (ISF), overseeing the direction of ISF Magazine for 10 years.
“I’m looking forward to building on Transcend’s success driving efficiency and innovation in the collateral optimisation space,” explained Hodder. “As we accelerate our impact in Europe and make inroads into Asia, I look forward to being a part of the Company’s continued evolution as a critical enterprise solution for collateralised businesses.”
“Jonathan is coming on board during a time when the securities finance space is experiencing a great deal of change, with a greater focus on optimisation due to rising collateral, margin and operational demands. Jonathan’s expertise will be a great asset as we continue to enhance our product offering to address burgeoning challenges,” said Bimal Kadikar, Founder and CEO of Transcend. “It is an exciting time for Jonathan to be joining our team to not only help us expand our presence into new regions, but also bring a fresh set of ideas to one of the capital market industry’s fastest-evolving areas.”
In recent months, Transcend has been steadily building its team, growing by nearly 50% over the last year. Hodder will play a key role in building Transcend’s sales, business development and engineering teams within the EMEA region as the Company looks to onboard many new European-based clients in the months ahead.
ABOUT TRANSCEND
Transcend is on a mission to help global market participants achieve next-level performance results through innovative solutions that enhance liquidity, funding, and collateral decisions. With a growing roster of world-class banks, broker-dealers, asset managers and custodians as clients, the firm is quickly becoming the gold standard for inventory analytics, optimisation, and automation within a business-line or across the enterprise.
Led by a team of 140+ domain experts, Transcend addresses an array of complex financial, operational and regulatory concerns challenging the capital markets industry. For more information, visit transcendstreet.com and follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter.
Rising Interest Rates: New Hurdle or Considerable Opportunity?
To combat inflation and a potential overheating economy, the Federal Reserve has begun communicating plans to aggressively raise interest rates throughout 2022 and 2023. The Fed began with a modest increase of .25%, however market professionals are estimating as many as six additional rate increases in 2022 to move monetary policy toward a more neutral rate environment. Similar interest rate increases have occurred in other industrialized economies as inflation continues to grow globally. Market participants are now increasingly looking for new financing and trading efficiencies to get ahead of additional funding costs and the risk of stunting profitability and growth. While collateral optimization has always helped minimize funding and liquidity costs, the new rate environment is creating even greater urgency for optimization to drive P&L benefits.
The Impact on Financing Collateral
The first impact of potential changes in the rate environment are increases in absolute interest rates and the overall costs to finance collateral. Simply put, the cost of borrowing cash will be more expensive than it’s been in years and will increase the overall costs to support certain trading and customer financing strategies. Banks and broker dealers have enjoyed a period of relative calm for balance sheets; however, as central banks step away from asset purchases, there will be new supply that needs to be financed in the market. As a result, firms that are inefficiently utilizing their collateral and unsecured funding risk impacting their P&L.
In addition to increases in absolute rates, the new environment can mean it will be more costly to support long-term funding and financing lower-quality collateral. While there are various projections for future funding costs as a result of rate increases, the premia for longer term funding could increase over time. Additionally, funding spreads for lower quality collateral could increase and create a more punitive environment for financing non-government collateral. Volatility of certain asset classes, including corporate bonds, may act as an accelerant for credit spread widening. These potential changes to term premia and spreads would impact certain portfolios and trading strategies, impacting the funding costs and P&L of those businesses.
Finally, rising interest rates can also influence firms’ risk tolerance and subsequently their investment choices, ultimately causing certain sources of funding to be less attractive, less stable and harder to manage.
An Opportunity for Optimization
With increasing absolute rates, spreads and term premia, the cost of financing businesses is set to be higher and more volatile. The goal of an effective collateral optimization strategy is to help market participants extract the greatest value from their financial resources; as such, there is a large opportunity for collateral optimization to maintain and increase profitability. By evaluating the costs of financing various collateral types with differing qualities, an optimization strategy will help firms more strategically select the collateral that meets a counterparty’s eligibility requirements while minimizing liquidity and funding costs to the business. With higher costs to consider, the potential savings from a collateral optimization strategy will materially increase.
Optimization Potential in Practice
Transcend has seen firms realize significant benefits from implementing collateral optimization across their financing and margining activity. By strategically implementing end-to-end solutions that incorporate funding /capital costs, collateral eligibility and operational costs into their optimization solutions, firms have been able to automate the allocation of preferred collateral to these exposures and obtain millions in annualized saving across financial, efficiency and risk factors.
In an environment of increasing absolute rates, wider spreads and higher costs of unsecured funding, these firms are poised for even greater cost savings. Transcend’s research and analysis team found that based on conservative rate assumptions, potential savings from optimization could increase an additional 16% to 250%.
The Importance of Technology
The value of being able to optimize vertically or horizontally across collateral silos under new a rate environment is clear. However, achieving collateral optimization can be difficult without the right partners and tools. While developing a cross-product collateral optimization solution in house can take several years, market participants need to implement an optimization solution now before rate increases impact profitability. As a result, more firms are looking to partner with companies like Transcend to more quickly mitigate the impact of a new rate environment.
However, not all optimization solutions are the same. With a holistic optimization platform built on enterprise inventory that considers multiple cost dimensions, market participants can more effectively understand and improve the utilization of collateral in totality, thus limiting unnecessary financing and liquidity costs. A single optimization solution for all asset classes, tri-party providers, and margin needs will deliver significantly higher returns, and ultimately will be a firm’s competitive financial edge. However, scalability is also crucial to ensuring both the immediate and long-term value of optimization results. By leveraging technology that can optimize decisions within a specific product or business-line first, with the opportunity to expand to multiple divisions over time, clients can realize a quicker time to value without limiting future potential.
Lastly, an effective optimization solution should enable straight-through-processing. Delivering the collateral that maximizes cost reduction could require complex collateral mobilization activities. As a result, any optimization solution needs to be able to automate and seamlessly execute movement recommendations in order to limit operational friction and roadblocks.
Introducing Transcend
The market evolution is creating real urgency for firms who have not yet invested in collateral optimization to implement tried-and-true solutions and stay ahead of the impact of incremental rate increases. Similar feedback from market participants has revealed the importance of solutions that can automatically adapt to fast-changing environments.
With a history of successes deploying cross-product and cross-business optimization solutions at some of the industry’s largest banks and broker dealers, Transcend is the solution of choice to address the urgent optimization requirements under the new rate environment. Transcend’s holistic data framework and powerful, yet configurable, optimization algorithm ensures that clients can achieve the greatest optimization results today, while scaling to address rate and market evolution in the future. With an integrated booking service, Transcend ensures it’s clients can execute their optimization strategy both quickly and efficiently.
With a team of 140+ seasoned industry professionals possessing decades of hands-on capital markets and technology expertise, Transcend partners with clients to design an implementation strategy that delivers results in months, not years. This means, new clients can achieve tangible optimization benefits before interest rates severely impact their firm’s growth and profitability.
This article was originally published in the Securities Finance Times Technology Annual 2022
Collateral Deluge: How collateral receivers can manage an increasingly complex collateral management process
Webinar Recording
Collateral Deluge: How collateral receivers can manage an increasingly complex collateral management process
As the number of firms that are subject to initial [and variation] margin grows, the ability to manually manage collateral throughout the trade and margin lifecycle becomes more overwhelming. Traditionally, there’s been a greater focus on addressing the challenges of the collateral pledgor, while the needs of the collateral receiver have been de-prioritized.
On Wednesday, April 27, speakers from Transcend, Acadia and Euroclear came together to discuss the trends, challenges, and solutions around the current collateral deluge